Springer Nature Manuscript Formatting Guidelines

Springer Nature is one of the world's largest and most prestigious scientific publishers, encompassing an enormous portfolio: the Nature-branded journals (Nature, Nature Medicine, Nature Communications, Nature Human Behaviour, and hundreds more), Springer journals (Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, and thousands more discipline-specific titles), BioMed Central's open-access portfolio, and Scientific Reports. While this breadth creates brand complexity for authors, Springer Nature journals that fall outside the Nature portfolio share a consistent baseline formatting framework for initial peer-review submission. Understanding that baseline — and its critical differences from the Nature-specific workflow — is the first step to a clean, desk-rejection-free submission.

2. Key Distinction — Nature Portfolio vs Springer Journals

This guide covers the formatting baseline for Springer Nature's non-Nature-branded journals — Springer journals, BioMed Central titles, and Scientific Reports. These journals share a common peer-review manuscript format.

Nature portfolio journals (Nature, Nature Medicine,Nature Communications, Nature Biotechnology, etc.) operate under a completely different and proprietary formatting specification. Key differences include:

If you are submitting to a Nature-branded journal, see the Nature journal formatting guidelines for the complete Nature-specific rules. The remainder of this guide applies to Springer journals, BioMed Central, and Scientific Reports.

3. Core Document Formatting

The following settings form the standard peer-review manuscript format expected by Springer journals. These apply to initial submission and should be in place before you upload to the Springer submission system (Editorial Manager or a journal-specific portal).

Continuous line numbering is particularly important because Springer's Editorial Manager system uses it as the basis for reviewer annotations. Reviewers writing detailed critiques will reference line numbers throughout their comments — without them, turnaround correspondence becomes ambiguous and slow. See the complete guide to adding continuous line numbers in Word if you need to configure this.

Zoom

Figure 1: Microsoft Word Layout tab showing continuous line numbers enabledClose

Figure 1: Enable continuous line numbering via Layout → Line Numbers → Continuous in Microsoft Word before submitting to any Springer Nature journal.

4. Standard Manuscript Structure

The sequence below reflects the standard order for an original research article submitted to a Springer journal. Review articles, case reports, and methods papers may vary — always consult the journal's specific author instructions.

1. Title Page — Full manuscript title, running head (≤50 characters including spaces), all authors in order with full affiliations (department, institution, city, postal code, country), corresponding author contact details (email, postal address, telephone), and ORCID iDs for all authors where available (mandatory for corresponding author on most Springer journals).
2. Abstract — Unstructured, maximum 250 words for most Springer journals. Clinical and health-science journals typically require a structured abstract with explicitly labelled subheadings (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions). Do not include references, figures, or undefined abbreviations in the abstract.
3. Keywords — 3–10 keywords following the abstract. Use established terminology from your discipline; for biomedical submissions, MeSH terms are preferred.
4. Introduction — Background context, rationale for the study, and statement of objectives or hypotheses.
5. Materials and Methods — Sufficient methodological detail for an independent researcher to replicate the study. Include ethics approval reference numbers where applicable.
6. Results — Systematic presentation of findings. Reference figures and tables in the order they appear.
7. Discussion — Interpretation of findings in the context of existing literature, acknowledgement of limitations, and implications.
8. Conclusions — Brief, standalone summary of contributions (optional but encouraged for Springer journals).
9. Declarations — Mandatory block. See the next section for full details.
10. References — Double-spaced. Style per journal requirements (Vancouver numeric is most common; some Springer journals use APA).
11. Figure Legends — At the end of the manuscript, on a separate page titled “Figure Legends,” one legend per figure in order. Figures themselves are submitted as separate files.
12. Tables — At the end of the manuscript, after figure legends (if required by the journal), each on a separate page with a caption above the table.

Abstract Structure

Zoom

1Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions subheadings

2Continuous line numbers running through title and abstract

3Zero citation rule strictly enforced in abstract body

Figure 2: Microsoft Word document showing Springer Nature structured abstract headers (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions) with continuous line numberingClose

Figure 2: Figure 2: Structured abstract formatting for Springer journals: Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusions subheadings formatted in bold with continuous line numbering.

1Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions subheadings

2Continuous line numbers running through title and abstract

3Zero citation rule strictly enforced in abstract body

5. Mandatory Declarations Block

Springer's most distinctive structural requirement — and the most common source of editorial returns — is the Declarations section. This is a dedicated section that must appear before the References and must contain all of the following subsections, with an explicit heading for each. If a subsection is not applicable, the required entry is “Not applicable.” — the subsection heading must still be present.

A correctly structured Declarations section heading tree looks like this:

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the [Name] Ethics Committee (approval no. [number]). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the [Repository Name] repository, [DOI or URL].

Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding
This work was supported by [Agency] [Grant No.].

Authors' contributions
J.S.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft. A.K.: Formal Analysis, Software. P.C.: Supervision, Funding Acquisition.

Acknowledgements
The authors thank [Name] for technical assistance with [aspect].

Why This Matters

Unlike Elsevier, which uses the YPYW model, Springer journals actively check for Declarations completeness at the editorial desk before the manuscript is assigned to an editor. An incomplete Declarations section — even one missing a single “Not applicable.” entry — will result in an editorial return that typically adds 1–3 weeks to your submission timeline.

6. Springer LNCS and Proceedings — A Different Format Entirely

Computer science and engineering researchers should be aware that Springer's Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) proceedings series and related proceedings volumes (LNAI, LNBI, CCIS, etc.) use a completely different manuscript format from Springer journals:

ScholarSpec handles the LNCS format via the springer-proceedings preset. If you are submitting to a conference proceedings volume rather than a journal, make sure to select the correct preset so the engine applies the single-spaced, 10pt, 122 mm × 193 mm specification rather than the double-spaced journal format.

7. 5 Common Desk Rejection Causes at Springer

The following causes account for the majority of editorial returns at Springer journals before peer review has even begun:

1. Incomplete Declarations section — Missing any of the seven required subsections is the top cause of editorial returns at Springer. Even a paper with no human subjects, no funding, and no conflicts must include “Not applicable.” entries for every inapplicable subsection. Omitting the heading itself is not acceptable.
2. Abstract exceeds word limit or uses the wrong structure — Unstructured abstracts submitted to clinical Springer journals (which require Background / Methods / Results / Conclusions subheadings) are a routine return trigger. Always check the journal's specific author guidelines — abstract requirements are not uniform across the Springer portfolio.
3. Running head not provided or exceeds 50 characters — The running head is a shortened version of the title placed in the page header of published articles. It must be provided on the title page and must not exceed 50 characters including spaces. Omitting it signals the author has not read the author guidelines.
4. Figures at insufficient resolution — Springer's production team requires a minimum of 300 DPI for photographs and 600–1200 DPI for line art and graphs. Submitting embedded, screen-resolution figures (72–96 DPI) may not cause an immediate desk rejection during peer review, but will trigger a revision request during production. For initial submission, provide figures at the required resolution from the start.
5. Missing or incorrect ORCID iDs — Springer Nature has been progressively mandating ORCID iDs across its portfolio. Corresponding authors especially should register at orcid.org and include their 16-digit ORCID iD on the title page. Manuscripts where the corresponding author has no ORCID on file are increasingly returned during the editorial check.

8. Tables and Figures

Springer journals follow the same three-line academic table convention as Elsevier and Nature: top rule, mid-rule separating header from body, and bottom rule — no vertical lines. Table captions appear above the table. Figure legends appear at the end of the document (not embedded with the figure in the text), and individual figure files must be submitted separately in high resolution.

For detailed instructions on building a compliant three-line table in Microsoft Word, see the 3-line academic table formatting guide.

Zoom

Figure 3: Microsoft Word Table Design ribbon showing 3-line academic table bordersClose

Figure 3: Figure 3: Apply 3-line academic table borders (Top border, Bottom border, and Inside horizontal border; no vertical lines) via Word's Table Design ribbon for Springer submissions.

Comparing publishers? See the Elsevier formatting guide for a side-by-side look at how Elsevier's YPYW policy compares with Springer's more prescriptive Declarations block, or the Nature journal guide for the stricter Nature portfolio requirements.

Further reading: Nature journal formatting guidelines · 3-line academic table formatting · Continuous line numbers in Word · Desk rejection turnaround guide · Elsevier formatting guide